Sim time08:00:00
Speed60×
Shift A · Day 1

Laminator 1 Vacuum Excursion · 09:34–11:04

Cluster cluster_laminator1_0934_excursion
Modules affected
11
3 Scrap · 4 B · 0 C · 4 clean
Defect rate
64%
across the cluster
Avg signature match
67%
coherence 84%
Net impact
$710
risk $1,870 − salvage $1,160
Root cause: Laminator 1 vacuum hold spike to 7.2 mbar at 09:34, against a backdrop of membrane health below 0.85 for >24 h. 11 modules processed in the 90-minute window; 7 developed bubble defects (3 Scrap + 4 B-tier), 4 escaped.

Excursion timeline · 09:34 → 11:04 · 90 min

Vacuum Hold Pressure · Laminator 1
X-bar R chart
warn 8 · action 12 mbar
nominal 4warnactionModule laminationmod_showcase_combined_001 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_002 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_003 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_004 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_005 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_006 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_007 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_008 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_009 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_010 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_011 · A (clean)00:0007:5515:5000:003.027.9212.82
Single-cycle excursion to 7.2 mbar at 09:34 (just at warning threshold). Insufficient for sustained alert but enough to lock a gas pocket into this module.
Membrane Health · Laminator 1
I-MR chart
warn 0.85 · action 0.78 index
nominal 1warnactionModule processedmod_showcase_combined_001 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_002 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_003 · Scrap · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_004 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_005 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_006 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_007 · B · 198mod_cluster_laminator1_008 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_009 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_010 · A (clean)mod_cluster_laminator1_011 · A (clean)00:0007:5515:5000:000.760.891.02
Laminator 1 membrane has been below warning threshold (0.85) for 24+ hours, last replaced 2,650 cycles ago. Slow degradation enabled the single-cycle excursion.
Scrap with defect B/C-tier UnaffectedEach tick = one cluster module's processing time

Cluster Bayesian coherence — is this one cluster or many?

Confidence that all 11 modules share a single causal root:84%
Predicted signature
Single localized bubble in weakest seal region (bottom-left of Laminator 1 chamber)
Observed signature
7 of 11 modules show bottom-left bubble; 4 unaffected
Average signature match across affected modules: 67%. High coherence means the defects look like the same phenomenon — strong evidence of a common cause.

Economic impact

Total modules affected11
Scrap3
B-tier4
C-tier0
Unaffected (A-tier)4

Revenue at risk$1,870
Salvage realised$1,160
Net impact$710

If the platform's recommendation had been accepted at the right moment, projected savings:~$604 across this cluster.

Cluster-wide recommendations

Bring forward Laminator 1 membrane swap (do not wait for next planned downtime)
process
Membrane has been below warning threshold (0.85) for 24+ h. Continued operation risks further single-cycle excursions.
Eliminates the underlying mechanism for this cluster type.
Tighten X-bar R sustained-alert criteria for Laminator 1
station
Single-cycle excursions currently only logged, not alerted. They are the precursor to clusters like this.
Earlier detection of vacuum drift.
This cluster page shows how a single upstream excursion produces a coherent pattern across many modules. In production, every excursion that exceeds SPC thresholds is automatically grouped into a cluster, and cluster-level analysis runs continuously.